I have some idea about nALFS. Why nALFS use specialized profiles, when the information which is in profiles is in (B)LFS books? I think that there in only need to small reworking of books. In books need to be reworked the part with dependencies of packages to the syntaction which can uderstand nALFS. The tag userinput can look for configure stage <userinput=configure>./configure --prefix=/usr</userinput> for make <userinput=installing>make</userinput>. The optional sections can be labelwed <userinput=optional>. In this case can user interface of nALFS be very similar to now-the packages can have stages and sections. In this case can be packages downloaded from original sites too. The other parts witch text could nALFS ignore. What think you? I know, that there is jhalfs tool, but if I know this tool haven't userinterface like nALFS, and jhalfs can't parse only part of book like nALFS. Filip Bartmann
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
