Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
M.Canales.es wrote:
[snip]
Yes, that's good. :) Except that it would almost be better done as
individual files, like:
028-gcc-pass1.configure
028-gcc-pass1.make
028-gcc-pass1.install
So that they could be called and sent individually.
When writing Vowel I went through several iterations where I attempted to
break down the different stages of a package installation into filename
extension groups or numberical codes like that. I went through three or
four different systems before it became apparent that, no matter what you
do, there's always going to be a package or two that doesn't fit nicely
into the schema.
I asked myself what the difference really was between any of those and
decided that the only real difference is the apparent user at different
stages. My installation files are now a single file for each package (for
maintainability) separated only by a directive which instructs the engine
to change the apparent user and continue on. Just like following the
book. Except the book doesn't change user much.
Steven
--
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
