El Martes, 29 de Febrero de 2000 01:51, Kendrick escribió: > I think the issue is getting a tad confused here.
Not confused at all, at least to me. Thomas said that now, having available jhalfs, look like the *LFS profiles for nALFS are becoming obsolete. The answer is that yes, the is no need to keep updated the profiles due that jhalfs can build the base system in a more book-way than nALFS with not much maintenance involved. Of course, jhalfs can't do all the tasks requested for a full nALFS replacement, then a new alfs tool need to be developed to fit that requested features. The new alfs could to use or not jhalfs as a backend for some tasks, like to do by-the-book builds, but both are separate tools with different goals. -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
