Manuel:I have not spent much time on jhalfs as I have been waiting for a concensus on a new format. However, the attached file contain some changes I made to my earlier work on a unified system (an ugly beast but with potential). It will produce (h,c,l)fs bootable partitions with a little hand holding. Note:: No attempt was made to integrate blfs into the system.
The clfs has only been tested on x86,multi,pure. The remainder of the systems may work but I have not attempted to verify the output. Any review I could give would be like a eunuch giving a review of the Karma Sutra: it could only be from a theoretical point of view.
There are many details that need to be ironed out in the config, package and patch entity files (a common format would make life easier)
George. M.Canales.es wrote:
Hi!After a few weeks of pause I want to re-start the jhalfs development. A few small issues in the LFS code need be fixed, plus we need to improve the support for {C,H,B}LFS.My idea is to create a branch where to do a sources rewrite to make it modularized, based on a preliminary work from George Boudreau, but placing each function on a separate file and with a sources layout like this :TOP-LEVEL/ master.sh build-lfs --> link to master.sh build-clfs --> link to master.sh build-hlfs --> link to master.sh build-blfs --> link to master.sh COMMON/ config function1.sh function2.sh ... common.xsl LFS/ config master.sh function1.sh function2.sh ... lfs.xsl BLFS/ config master.sh function1.sh function2.sh ... blfs.xsl CLFS/ config master.sh function1.sh function2.sh ... clfs.xsl HLFS/ config master.sh function1.sh function2.sh ... hlfs.xsl What do you think?George, have you an updated version of the jhalfs-experimental POC or can we start that work based on the one send to me the day 14/02?
jhalfs-experimental.tar.bz2
Description: Binary data
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
