El Viernes, 17 de Marzo de 2006 22:58, George Boudreau escribió: > Manuel, Tor > > I am all for PM's if we can handle multiple styles. When you get > around to CLFS you will see I have hard coded, but easily removable, > some header info directly into the scripts.
Yes, I know, but the bash code will have many intrusive changes (deeper modularization, fix of dirty hacks, etc ..) while the XSL for LFS and HLFS is almost ready. > I know that GeorgeM nZyme project may provide us with a method of > dealing with the build data (extracted from xml docs) that "might" be > easier We will see... > than trying to incorporate mulitiple PM formats in a single xsl > script. If each PM is into their own patch, no matter what files/code they are patching. The default code must be neutre. When you apply a PM patch, then you start using that PM. As a sort term solution for the experimental branch, patching the XSL could be more feasible due that will have less changes. > oh well... hlfs script died.. ... that is the live. -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
