El Domingo, 2 de Abril de 2006 22:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: > Sorry, maybe I am missing something here. Why would it be such a huge > problem to have the tarballs in a different compression format? There was > a gzip'ed ncurses patch in LFS development version for a while after the > UTF-8 merge, so did this break all old and new code also?
The real issue is that until now in the LFS book there was no mention about the actual packages filenames, then in the jhalfs code the names are generated from general.ent plus a hardcoded .tar.bz2 (except for additional packages, whos names are actually into the book commands). I have ready a patch for LFS to put full dowloads links for all packages, like the ones in CLFS, HLFS, and BLFS. After that, we could just to use a XSL to generate wget scripts instead using the hacks that we are doing now. -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
