On 6/28/06, M.Canales.es <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
El Miércoles, 28 de Junio de 2006 19:51, Dan Nicholson escribió:
> It just has to be a different test than running fuser. It
> considerably slowed down my build. With jhalfs, 1 SBU = 19m. Without
> jhalfs, 1 SBU = 10m. gcc took forever.
Ufff.. In my system there is only some seconds of difference.
We need a less intrussive way to test that make is alive.
The numbers are a bit skewed. I was running a gnome session when
jhalfs was going and not without. gnome is pretty resource intensive
on my old box, so it slows builds.
But, yes, there needs to be a less intrusive way. I'm sure you guys
will think of something. :) If I have any more bright ideas, I'll let
you know. George's link looks promising.
--
Dan
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
