M.Canales.es wrote:
El Domingo, 27 de Agosto de 2006 17:17, George Boudreau escribió:
Manuel,
I have almost completed the modifications to the makefile design (I
have a fresh build running in the background). The only outstanding
issue left is to add the size statistics back in.
Once this build finishes I will send you a copy of the LFS
master.sh/Makefile and you can make comments. If all looks ok I will
work on the other books.
What is the status of that new Makefile generation?
I am doing a final pass for the LFS book with ICA enabled. I found
some problems with the ICA/farce scripts that exist in both trunk and
the experimental branch that I have not fixed yet.
When we adopted the 'logs/$@' convention the impact on ICA/farce code
was overlooked. Right now ICA/farce is broken in the trunk (and 1.0?).
All instances of logs/$@ in chroot code must be replaced with
logs/${this_script}. ( I never watched the development of the comparison
code and did not realized how it handled multiple passes)
If it looks that work, maybe the new code should be commit to experimental to
can add the blfs-tool dependencies installation based on that new Makefile
code.
To avoid having a lot of new features mixed in experimental, the "use only
menuconfig" changes can be merged to trunk.
The current blfs-tool support code could be merged also, if needed to keep a
clean experimental tree, commenting-out the required lines in Config.in.
I'm working now in the build scripts for blfs-tool dependencies.
I think you should commit all your blfs tools before I add my latest
batch of bug riddled code. The new makefile format does not add any new
features and is only an internal style change. I am modifying/replacing
every wrt_xxxx function and making many changes to each xLFS/master.sh.
I have a free evening and will make the necessary changes to trunk to
fix the ICA problem.
G
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
