Thomas Trepl wrote:
Hi,
On Monday 18 September 2006 23:04, George Boudreau wrote:
Thomas Trepl wrote:
Hi all,
when using the (new) kernel headers of the kernel package (2.6.18+), i
think the common/common-functions needs to be adjusted in the way that
the kernel tarball gets allways copied - not only if we have a config
file specified (that is round about line 830ff). Am i right?
jhalfs-1.0 has the parameter
GETKERNEL={0/1)
which forces a download/transfer of the kernel even if the 'config'
is not defined.
The SVN version has a menu selection
+ General Settings
+-> Retrieve Source Files
+-> Always retrieve kernel package
Thanks George, I'll have a look to that options - and do an update of the
local copy. Anyway, i think at least the defaults will need to be adjusted,
don't you think so? But it's not quite essential...
ah, before i forget, just a suggestion: Is it possible to rename the
{B,C,H,}LFS directories to {B,C,H,}LFS.d ? I have exported the jhalfs
installation and my software conglomeration via Samba (ok, a bit weird, but
it works well so far). On the client side, i had a lot of trouble with that
duplicate names of the scripts symlink and the dir (lfs<-->LFS). After i
patched the master.sh and renamed the dirs, i was able to start on my
laptop... Just a thought.
BTW, that jhalfs is a great tool!
The svn version different from jhalfs-1.0 There have been drastic
changes to the layout and configuration. Save a copy of your modified
1.0 before you retrieve a svn copy.
Enjoy the new & improved jhalfs
Cu
Thomas
___________________________________________________________
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
