M.Canales.es wrote:
El Martes, 17 de Octubre de 2006 05:32, George Boudreau escribió:
Manuel,
   I was expanding on an suggestion from Dan concerning simplification
of the generated Makefile.
   This code is very raw but it does work for LUSER with tests enabled
in LFS. I am still working on a method to include the optimization
switches.
   This method has possibilities of reducing both the generated makefile
and removing many of the common_functions procedures.

My concern with that method is, if I'm not wrong, that it will move the body of each target to a Makefile function, making more hard to insert conditional steps, like the ones required for optimizations or PACO.

Or maybe you are thinking on creating dynamically makefile-functions file based on configuration options.

There is so little left to be done with JHALFS I am doing this as a design exercise. I am looking at all possibilities and dynamic entry creation is one of them. Nothing is carved in stone. This may be a heretical statement, I am also looking at a non-makefile methodology. (We use so little of the makefile capabilities).

--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to