El Viernes, 3 de Noviembre de 2006 23:10, George Boudreau escribió: > As long as you have 2 free neurons able to make a connection you can > learn.
One and half could be enough? > jhalfs-2.0 serves its purpose well, to automate the extraction and > building of LFS series book. It is possible to move beyond this > definition but not without pain. Yes, and that is what need be evaluated: how many complicated could be to move on the bash code to a open framework plugins-friendly in front of porting the current and future planned features to a binary solution. > jhalfs-3.0 will have another definition and code will be written to > support those specs. Specs first, code later. I'm not good writing specs. IMHO, the new implementation must have all features found in jhalfs-2.x but coded in a way that further systems customizations, support for LFS-alike systems, and features enhancement could be achieved by adding plugins on top of the base code. If that can be made using bash, call it jhalfs-3.x. If decided that is better to use a compilable language based on the work and development done from George M., then call it alfs-1.x, trying to implement also that not-yet-supported features found in the "alfs Software Requirements Specification" specs. I any case, jhalfs-2.x need be maintained and keeped in a production-ready form until have a new tool able to replace it. -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
