On Friday 16 February 2007 18:53, M.Canales.es wrote: > That fix is now in trunk.
Thanks. > Well, tacking into account that all *LFS books have in their host > prerequisites that Bash must be available and that must be the shell used > by the builder user to set-up a sane environment, I don't see a real need > to do jhalfs POSIX-compatible. The only concern I had was that if we couldn't find some way of forcing the shell executed by `make' to be /bin/bash without affecting the environment of LFS package builds, jhalfs either simply wouldn't work on non-bash systems or might compromise the integrity of the build. As Dan and you have now found a workaround, that's fine by me. I've got far more important things to do with my time than rewrite already working scripts :) > But if you are willing to make such patch keeping availbables all current > jhalfs features and extensions I will be happly aplying it. -ENOTIME :-) Thanks again for everyones wonderful efforts on jhalfs! Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
