El Jueves, 15 de Marzo de 2007 21:40, George Boudreau escribió: > When I make the drastic changes to the makefile format the goal was > size reduction and maintaining the book build style. If I wanted to > build a particular package multiple times I forced a 'build failure' and > the makefile would abort. Not a practical work method for the general > public.
Plus, you must be watching the build to can stop it on the required point. > If you want to abort the makefile after a selected package has been > built we would need a testing method for a breakpoint variable passed on > the cmd line. > make BREAKPOINT=028-binutils-pass1 That looks feasible and simple to implement. Very good idea :-) > If the breakpoint is tested _before_ the housekeeping the dependency > flag/file is not created and the package can be rebuilt without > intervention. I think that could be better to stop after the touch to allow target-by-target builds. To redo an already done one is as simple as rm it touched file. > However, if you are looking for even more flexibility we could > beg/borrow/recycle some code from the LiveCD makefile. They have > implemented a few 'make [package-only]' routines and the same could be > done for jhalfs. What more flexibility could be needed beyond to can stop at a dessired point or to can run the targets one-by-one? -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
