El Miércoles, 28 de Marzo de 2007 20:58, Dan Nicholson escribió: > Ideally, this would go back to Robert and into HLFS, or something else > that makes the commands be successful. IMO, it's bad form to have > commands that are known to fail. Even if you're not scripting, a wise > person will ensure that commands are returning successfully.
The book explanations says that it must fail and show the output errors generated. Thats wy the book add "echo $?" after the command run, to be sure that the return status is not "0". In jhalfs we could live with a "0" in the logs while the actual errors are still logged. -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
