See comment inline below:

M.Canales.es wrote:
> El Jueves, 13 de Septiembre de 2007 12:34, Jean-Luc Delatre escribió:
>
>   
>> The check_prerequisites() in common/libs/func_check_version.sh fails on
>> FIND and GREP because "fancy" version numbers on Knoppix 5.1 contain
>> intermediate noise words which confuse the 'cut -d" " -f4'.
>>     
>
> There is no way to make happy all that distros that insist on customize the 
> default version string output for some tools. I such cases jhalfs will prompt 
> you:
>
> "If you are sure that you have installed a proper version of {prog_name}
> but jhalfs has failed to detect it, press 'c' and 'ENTER' keys to continue,
> otherwise press 'ENTER' key to stop jhalfs.  "
>
>
>   
>> And this does come from Config.in
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>   config MKFILE
>>    string "Makefile"
>>    default "$JHALFSDIR/Makefile"
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>     
>
> You are doing wrong assumptions. MKFILE define the full path to the build 
> Makefile to be generated after parsing the book, NOT the master Makefile 
> included in the jhalfs sources.
>
> Plus, that setting is under a "Internal settings" sub-menu that is labeled 
> "WARNING: for jhalfs developers only". 
>
> I think that the GUI is very clear here saying that you must not to change 
> the 
> settings founds inside that menu.
>
>
>   
>>>   To use this tool you MUST:
>>>
>>>    - have experience building {c,h,b}LFS packages
>>>       
>> NO! I don't want to, on the contrary I want to use ALFS to get this
>> experience even if the learning curve is steeper
>>     
>
> By design and developers decision, jhalfs is designed to be used for users 
> that have experience building manually *LFS systems. If you have never build 
> a *LFS system, you can still try use jhalfs, but don't cray if you don't know 
> how to use it. 
>   

It seems to me that a big part of the reason LFS exists is as a learning
tool to learn exactly how to go about build a linux system from source
from the ground up.  So, I think Manuel's comment above is well founded.

>   
>>>     If you do not have the above skills, please don't use this tool.
>>>       
>> If you do not have software engineering skills beyond "cleverness" I
>> suggest you read this: http://catb.org/~esr/writings/cups-horror.html
>>     
>
> Instead of flame us, you should send constructive criticisms, discuss ideas 
> about how to improve the tool, and/or send patches to fix possible bugs. 
> After all, that is the open source philosophy.
>
>   

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to