On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd hate to think that changes to LFS would hinder the use/development of > jhalfs in any way. I find the tool vital in order to detect issues with the > LFS book's instructions (or, more accurately, my edits!) as it's the only way > I know I can test the book's instructions exactly. I agree with Matt. Right now there are no significant changes that would affect alfs. The last thing changed was when I added support for automatic updates of the MD5 sums for the boot scripts and udev configuration. I wouldn't think that would be a difficult fix. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
