On 04/04/2017 10:27, akhiezer wrote:
Hi,
Could the *alfs lists use '[...]' labels on subject lines - like what
lfs/blfs/clfs book/dev/support/trac/&c do - e.g.:
==
* LFS Trac Fri Mar 31 20:23 [lfs-book] [LFS Trac] Batch modify:
#4069, #4070
* LFS Trac Tue Apr 4 02:46 Re: [lfs-book] [LFS Trac] #4071: bc-1.07
* via blfs-book Sat Apr 1 15:39 [blfs-book] r18542 - in trunk/BOOK: .
introduction/welcome networking/netprogs
* [email protected] Sun Mar 19 22:15 [website] r1394 - html/trunk/alfs
* git Sun Apr 2 21:21 [Clfs-commits] [Cross-LFS]Cross-LFS Book
branch, master, updated. clfs-3.0.0-systemd-274-g13de3e1
==
Good question. It would make filtering easier. ATM, I use the "to"
field, which always contains "alfs-{log,discuss,...}", but it is
suboptimal... I guess Bruce would know what to do better than I would,
but let me look at that.
Pierre
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/alfs-discuss
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
