Also the loop method is correct too, its upto your code terminate once V*E is reached.
On 4/4/06, Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Locks can assure one process to do the job properly. It does not allow
multi process to do the same job at the same time. So it is not a
preferred way in my idea.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
- [algogeeks] breadth first search with cycle/ loop? Kevin
- [algogeeks] Re: breadth first search with cycle... Kevin
- [algogeeks] Re: breadth first search with c... Padmanabhan Natarajan
- [algogeeks] Re: breadth first search wi... Kevin
- [algogeeks] Re: breadth first searc... Padmanabhan Natarajan
- [algogeeks] Re: breadth first search with cycle... shalinmangar
- [algogeeks] Re: breadth first search with cycle... Tejas Kokje
- [algogeeks] Re: breadth first search with cycle... Kevin
