Thanks for your input Adak. I'm just wondering that how much of a difference will it create by using better hardware.
No matter how fast the computer is, at the end of the day, if the algorithm is inefficient, it won't bring too much of a difference. Would it help if I am able to tell you the exact number of flops for some of the operations...... Thanks for your help.. Regards On Jan 6, 7:50 am, adak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Of course, the run time will be less with a faster system. If you want > I'll run it on my 2.66 GHz core2 duo, > and report the result. > > A free file sharing site is swoopshare.com. If you'll zip the data > file you're using along with it, that will make the test much more > meaningful. > You'll need to copy the url swoopshare give you, and post it here - > otherwise no one can find it. > > Drive access time may cause some variations between our systems, but > some idea should be found. My drive is just > average SATA. No ultra-fast drive, here. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
