(reformatting last email)

>
>  these as 1 or 4 or something in between?
>
>  Also does a single node count as a tree?
>

These are good questions. In my problem, a binary tree is different if
the set of nodes are different. For example:

 a                 We have 9 different binary trees: {a}, {b}, {c},
  \                 {a,b}, {b,c}, {b,d}, {c,d}, {a,b,c}, {a,b,d}. It does
  b                 not matter the number of different binary trees
 /  \               that can be formed by each of these sets. The
d - c             set {b,c,d} can not be considered because it would
                    for a cycle, so it would not be a tree.

My initial question was not well specified. Sorry.

Bruno

>
>  On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Geoffrey Summerhayes
>  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >
>  >  On May 14, 8:39 am, pramod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >  > Let's say we have E number of edges and V number of vertices.
>  >  > Any subgraph which is a tree with V vertices will have V-1 edges. So
>  >  > we need to retain V-1 edges and eliminate the rest E-(V-1). So in a
>  >  > brute force manner if we retain any set of V-1 edges and see if the
>  >  > resultant graph is indeed a tree or not. So we need to test for E C
>  >  > (V-1) such cases. This is definitely an upper bound.
>  >  > We may optimize the above exponential algorithm by not considering
>  >  > those edges which are not part of any cycles since they can't be
>  >  > removed. And in the middle of removing the edges if we encounter an
>  >  > edge with vertex having a degree of only 1 then we can't remove that
>  >  > edge.
>  >
>  >  To OP, what counts as a distinct binary tree? Are you going to count
>  >
>  >  a       b    c      b
>  >   \     / \    \    / \
>  >   b   a   c    b  c   a
>  >    \          /
>  >     c        a
>  >  (use a monospace font to view)
>  >
>  >  these as 1 or 4 or something in between?
>  >
>  >  Also does a single node count as a tree?
>  >
>  >  For a minimum, counting single nodes you would get V
>  >  vertices/trees. For a simple, connected graph you also
>  >  get at least one path between any pair of nodes giving
>  >  an additional V*(V-1).
>  >
>  >  So a bare minimum would have at least V*V trees.
>  >
>  >  ----
>  >
>  >
>  > Geoff
>  >
>  >  >  >
>  >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to