Ok, Mr. Balaz. 2009/2/23 Miroslav Balaz <[email protected]>: > Yes but you mus be careful with c+r. > p > you should use c*X+r, where X is large enough number. > If you X is 2 to 16,(16th power of two), the you get the same as using first > two bytes for collection and second for number, > but you can use. ==> Yes, I will do it. Moreover, this was my intention, because de plus sign "+", in this case, not represent the sum operation, but a concatetion operation, like yours formula.
> The radix sort is good idea. ==> Thanks. > But i suppose not to keep data separatedly for each person, but to keep it > all together in one big tree. > This maybe sounds like anti-object-oriented, but it is much faster in > searching. ==> Well, I don`t think this, but understand You. Moreover, I think that object-oriented relates directly to program`s design. So, if a program has design that use this technique, I no think it is anti-object-oriented. Then, more once time, thank You. > 2009/2/23 Luciano Pinheiro <[email protected]> >> -- ---------------------------------------- Luciano Soares Pinheiro Jr. Analista desenvolvedor Sr. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
