@ankur how u can solve it in o(n)
i suppose u need atleast o(n lgn)

On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 2:52 PM, ankur aggarwal <[email protected]>wrote:

> o(n) is the best sol known to me..
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Pramod Negi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> i guess sorting will do the work.
>> any other constraint??
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 9:52 AM, p0r$h <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Given an array of integers A[N], find the maximum value of (j-k) such
>>> that A[k] <= A[j] & j>k.
>>> I am looking for a solution with time complexity better than O(N^2).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<algogeeks%[email protected]>
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks
> -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.

Reply via email to