thanx to all.special one to Sathaiah Dontula ..i got ur point and it is completely valid..!!!
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 1:37 PM, TurksHead Education < [email protected]> wrote: > This is because by definition linked lists are dynamic.. If they reside on > stack they cannot be dynamic (extensible in size) > > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 2:42 AM, aman goyal <[email protected]> wrote: > >> why do we use malloc funtcn to allocate memory for a stuct node variable >> pointer.. >> why dont we simply write struct node p; >> instead we do >> struct node *p >> p=malloc(........); >> >> any valid reasons for this?? >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Algorithm Geeks" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]<algogeeks%[email protected]> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Algorithm Geeks" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<algogeeks%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
