@sharad while storing each element in hash by your approach u ll check if its already there in hash. so the complexity here will be O(n2). correct me if i m wrong. isnt there ny better algo..?
On 6 June 2010 06:28, sharad kumar <[email protected]> wrote: > @dhivya:keep storing the first occurance element index in hash map and then > start insertin eleement ....based on index position > > > On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 12:31 AM, divya <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Given an array with some repeating numbers. Like 12,6,5,12,6 >> >> output: 12,12,6,6,5 >> 12 shud come before 6 since it is earlier in list. So cant use a >> dictionary. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Algorithm Geeks" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]<algogeeks%[email protected]> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. >> >> > > > -- > yezhu malai vaasa venkataramana Govinda Govinda > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Algorithm Geeks" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<algogeeks%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
