Anand, do it in binary.

Dave

On Jun 23, 1:29 pm, Anand <[email protected]> wrote:
> @Dave I tried your logic on 15 it got converted to 10, 4, 4,4. But still
> could not understand the logic could you please explain?
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Dave <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Did you actually try the code by hand on a number to see what it does?
> > If you do, you will see that the first statement replaces the bits in
> > each pair of bit positions with the number of bits in those positions.
> > The second adds the bits in each pair of pairs, replacing each nibble
> > with the number of bits originally set in that nibble. Etc.
>
> > Dave
>
> > On Jun 22, 10:54 am, divya jain <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > @ dave
> > > how did u come to this formula... m nt getting the logic..
>
> > > @ sathaiah
> > > yes u r rite
>
> > > On 22 June 2010 19:32, chitta koushik <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > > For more such problems and solns
>
> > > >http://graphics.stanford.edu/~seander/bithacks.html<http://graphics.stanford.edu/%7Eseander/bithacks.html>
> > <http://graphics.stanford.edu/%7Eseander/bithacks.html>
>
> > > > for (c = 0; v; c++)
> > > > {
> > > >   v &= v - 1; // clear the least significant bit set
> > > > }
>
> > > > O(k)   -- no. of bits set in the number
>
> > > > --Koushik C
>
> > > > On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Dave <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > >> Assuming 32 bit integers:
> > > >> n = ((x >> 1) & 0x55555555) + (x & 0x55555555)
> > > >> n = ((n >> 2) & 0x33333333) + (n % 0x33333333)
> > > >> n = ((n >> 4) & 0x0F0F0F0F) + (n & 0x0F0F0F0F)
> > > >> n = ((n >> 8) & 0x00FF00FF) + (n & 0x00FF00FF)
> > > >> n = ((n >>16) & 0x0000FFFF) + (n & 0x0000FFFF)
>
> > > >> n now is the number of bits set in x. Time is O(1).
>
> > > >> Dave
>
> > > >> On Jun 22, 6:26 am, divya <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> > find the no. of bits set in a no. in logn time
>
> > > >> --
> > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups
> > > >> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> > > >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > >> [email protected]<algogeeks%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups­.com>
> > <algogeeks%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups­.com>
> > > >> .
> > > >> For more options, visit this group at
> > > >>http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>
> > > >  --
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups
> > > > "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > [email protected]<algogeeks%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups­.com>
> > <algogeeks%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups­.com>
> > > > .
> > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.-Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<algogeeks%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups­.com>
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.

Reply via email to