Is not ur code is running in o(n^2) complexity ....
You have used two while loop ...
plzz eleborate if i m wrong .....

On Jul 12, 11:00 am, Amit Mittal <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think this will work.
>
> # include "stdio.h"
>
> void my_print(int *,int);
> void swap(int &a , int&b)
> {
>  a = a + b;
>  b = a - b;
>  a = a - b;}
>
> void sort(int* array, int SIZE, int i, int j)
> {
>         while(i<j)
>         {
>                 my_print(array,SIZE);
>                 if(array[i] <= array[j])
>                         i++;
>                 if(array[j] < array[i])
>                 {
>                         swap(array[i] , array[j]);
>                         i++;
>                         int temp = j;
>                         while(temp< (SIZE-1) && (array[temp] > array[temp+1]) 
> )
>                         {
>                             swap(array[temp] , array[temp + 1]);
>                              temp++;
>                         }
>                 }
>         }
>
> }
>
> void my_print(int * array, int SIZE)
> {
>         printf("\n");
>         int i = 0;
>         for(; i < SIZE ; i++)
>                 printf("%d, ",array[i]);
>         printf("\n");}
>
> int main()
> {
>         int array1[8] = {1,3,6,7,4,5,6,8};
>         int array2[10] = {1,2,3,5,6,7,4,8,9,10};
>         int array3[10] = {10,20,30,40,50,23,27,40};
>
>         //sort(array1,8,0,4);
>         //sort(array2,10,0,6);
>         sort(array3,8,0,5);
>         //my_print(array1,8);
>         //my_print(array2,10);
>         my_print(array3,8);
>         return 0;
>
> }
>
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Abhishek Kumar Singh <
>
>
>
> [email protected]> wrote:
> > @souravsain
>
> > for input {10,20,30,40,50,23,27};
> > ur output is coming  10, 20, 23, 27, 40, 30, 50,
> > which not SORTED array.....
>
> > On Jul 10, 6:19 pm, souravsain <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > @Jitendra
>
> > > I have run the code with input given by you and found that it works
> > > well.
>
> > > Please have a look athttp://codepad.org/iMBTwAL7
>
> > > Appriciate the effort taken by you to analyze the solution and do let
> > > me know if you still do not agree with the code.
>
> > > Regards,
> > > Sourav
>
> > > On Jul 8, 9:03 pm, Jitendra Kushwaha <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > @souravsain
> > > > Consider your algo for the case
> > > > int arr[] = {10,20,30,40,50,23,27};
>
> > > > everytime when you increment the j you are missing on element i.e j-1
> > for
> > > > further comparison
>
> > > > --
> > > > Regards
> > > > Jitendra Kushwaha
> > > > MNNIT, Allahabad
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<algogeeks%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups 
> > .com>
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.

Reply via email to