http://rjlipton.wordpress.com/2010/08/12/fatal-flaws-in-deolalikars-proof/ Looks like there are serious flaws with this proof but it can produce other interesting results.
<http://rjlipton.wordpress.com/2010/08/12/fatal-flaws-in-deolalikars-proof/> Kishen On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 7:30 AM, LawCounsels <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 11 Aug, 23:54, Kishen Das <[email protected]> wrote: > > http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/7938238/Computer-scie... > > > > Check out this cool news. > > > > Kishen > > On 10 Aug, 06:50, Niels Fröhling <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Up to date reactions, comments of the community/researchers (summary): > > > http://rjlipton.wordpress.com/2010/08/09/issues-in-the-proof-that-p%E... > > > > Deolalikar may possibly have proven the lesser significant of either > P! > =NP (not the more 'unthinkable' P=NP) ... > > it appears New Generation Lossless Data Representations likely point > the way forward to prove the 'converse' P=NP feasible ! > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Algorithm Geeks" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<algogeeks%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
