On 6 August 2011 21:50, saurabh singh <saurab...@gmail.com> wrote:

> padding should depend on m/c size according to my logic....



machine as well as the compiler

>
>
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 9:32 PM, sukran dhawan <sukrandha...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> it all depends on word size of the computer.since int by default is equal
>> to word size and double usually occupies 8 bytes all of these start from a
>> new memory boundary.so if only part of it filled rest of them will be
>> holes.tat is the whole reason why structures cannot be compared for equality
>> and its a syntax error
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Aditya Virmani 
>> <virmanisadi...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> i guess it depends on ur system configuration...for 32 bit
>>> machines...respective sizes allocated would be 4,4,8 :giving 16
>>> & on 64 bit machines it wud be 8,8,8: giving 24. Correct me if i am
>>> wrong.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 9:24 PM, SANDEEP CHUGH 
>>> <sandeep.aa...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> @ sukran , nitish :
>>>> guys, i dnt knw about the output from these online compliers..
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 9:20 PM, SANDEEP CHUGH 
>>>> <sandeep.aa...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> @payel : according to u,,starting address cannot be 4.. ok.
>>>>> but wat if i hav used the following structure before that structure
>>>>>
>>>>> struct demo1
>>>>> {
>>>>> char a;
>>>>> int b;
>>>>> char c;
>>>>>
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Nitish Garg 
>>>>> <nitishgarg1...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Why does Ideone https://ideone.com/1Uwxx gives 16?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/algogeeks/-/L-zANxDDTUQJ.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>  --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>>>
>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Saurabh Singh
> B.Tech (Computer Science)
> MNNIT ALLAHABAD
>
>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>



-- 
Regards
Siddharth Srivastava

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.

Reply via email to