@aditi since in the hierarchy m1 comes first so if it is a hit then we dont need to check m2 but in case of a miss 0.03*2 seconds are wasted while searching in m1 then that value is looked for in m2 so i suppose the best answer is given by rohit jain. unless there is some missing data
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 5:41 PM, aditi garg <[email protected]>wrote: > @Rohit: we wont include the miss time fr M2 then? > > > On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 5:36 PM, rohit jain <[email protected]>wrote: > >> @aditi >> >> For the first question. >> The answer will be ((0.97 *2) + (0.03*2) +(0.03*100)) i.e 5 ns. >> The reason is that cache is accessed in the case of miss as well, so >> we need to include that time as well. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Algorithm Geeks" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. >> >> > > > -- > Aditi Garg > Undergraduate Student > Electronics & Communication Divison > NETAJI SUBHAS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY > Sector 3, Dwarka > New Delhi > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Algorithm Geeks" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
