in the solution I proposed, k is doing the job of count. I think u should look at it again.
Sanju :) On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:42 AM, tanuj chawla <[email protected]> wrote: > @sanjay - shouldnt we use count instead of second k..... and when count > becomes size/2,we get the element becouse we dont know the array in which > that element resides.... > correct me if m wrong?? > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Algorithm Geeks" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
