@ Digo ..i got almost wat u said...can u give me a example with 3-4 nodes...it will help me a lot..thnx..
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 1:43 AM, Digo <[email protected]> wrote: > See you are actually passing the address of 'rest' each time, so the > changes made to *head_ref are actually reflected in the value at the > address of 'rest' each time the recursive call returns, so the value > of 'rest' is carried backwards to the front once we start popping from > the tail of the list. Hence you have 5th node at the head towards the > end. Hope this helps. :) > > Dipit Grover > B.tech 3rd year > IIT Roorkee > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Algorithm Geeks" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
