Simple, refer this:
http://www.geeksforgeeks.org/archives/2405

On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Abhishek Sharma <[email protected]>wrote:

> @Bhupendra: your approach is correct but in case the linked lists contain
> millions of nodes then this might be an overhead.
>
> Another approach could be:
>
> - Start with the head of of both the lists.
> - Store (Hash) the addresses to which the current nodes are pointing to,
> in a hashtable.
> - while storing (Hashing) also check if the address already exists (for
> both of them). In case it exists in the hashtable, this address (or node)
> is the required node else, increment the pointers to the next nodes.
>
> This algo will not require traversing the whole lists and will save time.
>
> Regards,
> AB
>
>
> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Umer Farooq <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> You don't have to traverse the nodes of two lists simultaneously.
>>
>> You have to check if the every node of list one matches with the address
>> of any node of list two. The first matching address will be the output.
>>
>> The worst case running time of this algo will be O(n^2)
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 8:47 PM, rafi <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> i dont understan if i look in the pic i attached then the length of
>>> the first list is 5 and the length of the second list is 6.
>>> what should i do now?
>>> if i traverse the long list 5,6 nodes i dont get to the red node.
>>> what am i missing?
>>>
>>> On 1 מאי, 18:04, Bhupendra Dubey <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > start from head of both and  as soon as one of the list is empty means
>>>  you
>>> > hit null
>>> > start counting the remaining number of nodes in the other list till
>>> that
>>> > gets empty.
>>> >
>>> > Now the number obtained  above is the difference in length of the two
>>> list
>>> > prior to the first common node (the red node). Now again traverse the
>>> > longer list corresponding to the above count and then start
>>>  traversing the
>>> > other list .Stop when two nodes become equal. Home!:)
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 7:55 PM, רפי וינר <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > > you have two linked lists that some where combine in to one list.
>>> > > pic attached to illustrate
>>> > >  [image: Inline image 1]
>>> > > you need to find where the two list collide. (in the pic the red
>>> node)
>>> >
>>> > > --
>>> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups
>>> > > "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>>> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> > > [email protected].
>>> > > For more options, visit this group at
>>> > >http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > bhupendra dubey
>>> >
>>> >  Untitled.png
>>> > 14Kהצגהורדה
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Umer
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.

Reply via email to