can be done using skip lists
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Jeevitesh <[email protected]>wrote: > This is possible only if Linked List is sorted then we can apply Merge > Sort for Linked List which would be in place. > > Otherwise the time complexity would be O(n logn). > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:00 PM, VIHARRI <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi we need find a node in linked list in O(logn). You can change the list >> as u like. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Algorithm Geeks" group. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/algogeeks/-/vSoEXlaRTEIJ. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. >> > > > > -- > *Thanks, > Jeevitesh Shekhar Singh.* > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Algorithm Geeks" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
