a pure virtual function does not have definition. Since pure virtual destructor has a definition so its only for not allowing the object instantiation, although it does not have any other abstract functions.
-- Amitesh On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Amitesh Singh <[email protected]>wrote: > It can done using pure virtual destructor. > > struct A > { > //your implementation .. > .. > .. > virtual ~A() = 0; > }; > A::~A() > { > } > > > -- > Amitesh > > > > > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 1:44 PM, himanshu kansal < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> How will u implement an abstract class in c++ w/o using pure virtual >> function??? >> >> will making all the constructors and assignment operators protected >> suffice....??? >> i doubt since the derived classes will be able to create objects of >> that class....and according to definition of abstract class, no object >> of it should be created... >> >> >> any other way....?? >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Algorithm Geeks" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. >> >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
