To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41370
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 2 00:58:04 -0800 2005 ------- - please be aware of the fact that the regular translation and documentation deadlines already passed, and we should stretch them for really important issues only. Personally, I am not sure if this one here fits into this category. - Actually, the database which is being edited is a file, in all cases. It might refer to a database which is no file (for instance on some server), but the actual .odb file is exactly this: a file. While I agree that "database file" is not the best choice of all, "database" alone is dangerous: It suggests that the thing is a "database" in, for instance, MS Access' sense, i.e. a self-contained file. This isn't the case here - and we all know that MS Access users is what we aim at with 2.0. Actually, this was the reason why we did not name this "database", since we needed to find a compromise between promising too much, and still offerring some known terms. - If we are really going to change this string, I'd prefer "database document". Unfortuately, this would also require changing the respective string in File|New, for consistency reasons. - I'm cc'ing the iTeam of the application, to collect some opinions --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
