To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53682
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 04:31:11 -0700 2005 ------- @mmeeks: Two issues: 1 Your patch, unlike the original code, calls fcntl even when aflock.l_type==F_WRLCK. I assume that is not intended. 2 According to SUSV3, fcntl/F_SETLK may return ENOLCK when "satisfying the lock or unlock request would result in the number of locked regions in the system exceeding a system-imposed limit", and what the comment in your patch considers "locking not supported" is, again according to SUSV3, indicated by EINVAL instead of ENOLCK. Following SUSV3, I would thus assume that ENOLCK should cause osl_openFile to fail (and that instead EINVAL might be handled in a special way, ignoring the lock request). Under what conditions do you experience ENOLCK on SuSE 10.0? Always? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
