To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41809
User mav changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Status|NEW |STARTED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 2 03:59:58 -0800
2005 -------
> Just for curiosity: Why the precedence of manifest over mimetype?
>From my point of view "mimetype" substream is just an optional extension that
duplicates information stored in "manifest.xml" for the purposes you have
mentioned already, "manifest.xml" is the main source of document type
information in the package format.
Using of "mimetype" stream as a source to get package mediatype information
looks for me to be close to using of document URL extension for the same reason.
It seems to be acceptable only as a fallback solution. And in case of conflict
with the value stored in "manifest.xml" the latest one should be used.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
