To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41034
User mhu changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 2 05:39:42 -0800
2005 -------
Hi kendy,
As Philipp (aka 'pl') already mentioned, the change introduced with cws res32bit
is intentional and for a good reason. If you like some rationale behind that
change, please have a look at
http://udk.openoffice.org/common/man/concept/micro_deployment.html
So, your patch would re-introduce a behaviour / dependency that I consider as
bad design (or "broken" to be very clear about it). Moreover, it does so in a
way that the "wrong" path is searched first, where I would have expected it as a
(catch all) fallback, at best.
Thus, I'm rejecting your patch for the above stated reasons, and resolve this
issue as 'wont fix'.
Please have a look at the already implemented fallback via environment variable,
as commented by 'hjs'.
Regards,
Matthias
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
