To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56304
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 21 01:41:24 -0700 2005 ------- Of course the 'containment' layout prototype patch from those years ago is here (for comparison): http://go-oo.org/ooo-build/patches/test/layout-ids.diff http://go-oo.org/ooo-build/patches/test/layout-rsc.diff http://go-oo.org/ooo-build/patches/test/layout-test.diff http://go-oo.org/ooo-build/patches/test/layout-vcl-layout.diff http://go-oo.org/ooo-build/patches/test/layout-vcl-window.diff Of course - the common element here is the need to determine the preferred Window (widget) size. Indeed I assume that the: + virtual void VtkAllocateSize( const Size &aSize ); + virtual void VtkRequestSize( Size &rSize ); methods in Window are really the basis for any proposed sol'n here. Of course - all things considered, IMHO the XUL approach is preferable ridding us of the evil that is RSC, providing rapid GUI development / prototyping, removing the compile phase etc. etc. :-) Either way - looks like an interesting prototype Caolan. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
