To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57253
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 1 22:43:55 -0800 2005 ------- obr -> ericb: %PRODUCTVERSION expands to "2.0" and continues to do so in OOo 2.0.1. Maybe this is going to change for 2.0.2, but that's open for now. However, we freely can define what we think meets our needs best, so: do you think it should be (and stay) "2.0" or should we better go with "2" ? Actually I think it is hard to predict whether there will be a 2.2 version (maybe Mac specific ?) and if this will have a compatible configuration, so I would vote for "2.0". If we do a "compatible" 2.2 or such, we could still hack it to create a symbolic link 2.2 -> 2.0 instead of copying the content. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
