To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8946
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 14 16:11:56 -0800 2005 ------- Copying finding from issue 8947: The example attached [to issue 8947] reveals a feature (?) of the competitive product: FREQUENCY() class ranges don't have to be in ascending order (which mathematically is the only meaningful order), in fact they can be in any arbitrary (!) order, where after the sort the results then are remapped to the original order, for example: Classes: 10, 5, 15 Value: 5 Result: 0, 1, 0, 0 Result in Calc: 1, 0, 0, 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
