To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59550
User ab changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Status|NEW |STARTED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 20 01:11:55 -0800
2005 -------
ab->fs: I'm not sure if I understand your reason for setting this task to 2.0.2.
IIRC typical PP candidates are regression tasks or crashes that can be
reproduced by just using the office. But this bug must have been there since
inventing the introspection, not later then for SO 6 I guess. Besides this you
have to write C++ code to reproduce it. You can get as many crashes as
you want by writing C++ code even without using introspection... ;-)
And where's the connection to "scripting OOo"? Ok, you could script it with
Java using the scripting framework, but first I doubt that this is widely used
compared to Basic and second even then using the introspection service
from Java used as scripting language is not very likely. So it may be easy
to reproduce, but only if you target for it. You're the first who found this bug
in years, so in my opinion targetting it to OOo 3.0 really should be enough.
Is this ok for you?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
