To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60584
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 17 07:20:35 -0800 2006 ------- nemeth->cloph: See "Theory of the algorithm" section in the README.hyphen, plus substrings.pl and hyphen.c. Substrings.pl makes an unification process, too: ./substrings.pl jacke jacke.2 ISO8859-1 is embedded in ISO8859-1 +ISO8859-1 ack7entasche is embedded in ack7entasche +ack7entasche cken7tasche is embedded in ack7entasche ackentasche includes ckentasche at pos 1 ack7entasche + cken7tasche -> ack7en7tasche cken7tasche is embedded in cken7tasche +cken7tasche [altlinuxHyph]$ cat jacke.2 ISO8859-1 ack7en7tasche cken7tasche [altlinuxHyph]$ ./example jacke.2 <(echo Jackentasche) Jack-en-tasche > Does the algorithm only use the "biggest junk" that fits (and only one single > pattern), starting from the left? I think so. Please, remove the "no" in the #define noVERBOSE line of hyphen.c, and look at the work of the algorithm. Regards, Laci --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
