To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60584
User nemeth changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Issue type|DEFECT |TASK
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 24 17:45:06 -0800
2006 -------
nemeth->cloph: Liang's general hyphenation algorithm has two different
implementations (optimized versions of the original algorithm), one of D. E.
Knuth and one of Raph Levien. There is Knuth's algorithm closer to Liang's one,
than Levien's algorithm, but Levien's algorithm is only a clever implementation
of the original Liang's algorithm, too.
Raph Levien has made a mistake in the README, the `easy' explanation is about
the original Liang's algorithm. (OK, Liang was a PhD student of D. E. Knuth.
See Liang's thesis: http://www.tug.org/docs/liang/)
Also TeX use Liang's hyphenation algorithm (perhaps by Knuth's implementation,
I don't know): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TeX#Hyphenation_and_justification
I will add a reference to Liang's thesis in the source. Will be OK?
Regards,
Laci
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
