To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60698
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 6 03:03:30 -0800 2006 ------- Two questions concerning compatibility: (1) User has "old" dictionary and loads it with the patched Ooo version, makes some changes - in which format (old or new) will the dictionary be written? (2) User has a dictionary in "new" format (however he got it), but accesses the profile with an older, unpatched version of OOo (because e.g. he has two versions of OOo2 installed, but uses the same profile for both). What will happen? I think that file format changes should be done in major releases, where user data migration is possible in the installation/configuration step. Of course if a change in a file format fixes a major user problem we should do it even in a micro or minor release, but I fail to see a major user problem in this case. Yes, the file format is not useful for direct access by a text editor - but please explain why you think that it is necessary to be able to edit the user dictionary with an external program. That's still unclear to us. There are a lot of other options to change the dictionary: use the API (e.g. by a Basic Macro) or change the myspell/hunspell dictionary. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
