To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61278
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 7 03:55:32 -0800 2006 ------- geki: For what it's worth IMO patching individual files to work around that bug is futile as all such constructs get miscompiled/mishandled by gcj, instead I suggest you look at the redhat spec for a *horrible* hack which aliases a script as gcj which seds out privates and protecteds before handing off to the true gcj --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
