To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54505
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 19 05:31:38 -0800 2006 ------- they are from latex. so it is LPPL: The de patterns also didn't say they wewre based on LPPL ones, but only that tehy were based on the LateX ones withozt specifying anything concrete. Only after I filed this issue this got resolved (and yes, dehpyhn.tex says LPPL). I'd really not surpised if the other patters (which also *are* based on the TeX patterns are LPPLed, too. Anything else would wonder me). Plainly assuming that the converion author did something sensible is wrong, see the german example. But I can try to look at tetex' patterns. Not to mention some of those patterns in the source *do not have ANY* mention of any license.... --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
