To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62492
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 10 04:46:23 -0800 2006 ------- Finally some really positive feedback. Here it's what if discovered right now: The header it's something very common: it's a byte order mask so this file it's a valid XML. Take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byte_Order_Mark >From what i know this mask it's supported by XML specification. PS. I've tested with and without masks and Excel it's accepting the both files. The result of my investigation with Ooo (same file with and without 3-byte mask): test_with_mask.xml -> opens corectly in OOo 2.0 (opens calc) test_without_mask.xml -> opens corectly in OOo 2.0 (opens calc) test_with_mask.xls -> opens the ASCII Filter Options dialog (BAD) test_without_mask.xls -> opens as plain text in Writer (BAD) The correct beahaviour would be the same (first). The mask it's optional and it's telling the text encoding of the file (so it's text). I think the bug is that after detecting that the file is text it doesn't test for XML format. Something it's clear: OOo it behaving different on different file extensions even if the content it's the same. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
