To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63199
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 17 01:47:04 -0800 2006 ------- ->pl. It appears it's more difficult that I anticipated, mainly because it's difficult to build test-cases to check for regressions. For the test I use a hardware manuale I wrote with OOo, with a couple of images, logos, tables (around 130 pgs); an Impress presentation shown at OOo 2005 conf, another smal document. Test the resulting PDF document with Acrobat and print it full, so it is scanned (so I suppose...), then doing a check with gs to convert it to ps than back to pdf (BTW, during this conversion in gs the quality of the final PDF from gs is worst...). So far this catched the regression introduced in the process so far. I'll introduce another doc I wrote with OOo (this one http://www.tecsa-srl.it/en/pdf/TechDesc_19990523.0938V20_en.pdf, if you are wondering about the way it looks) plus other manuals with diagrams, embedded drawing (wmf metafile). The figures I got so far ranges from 1,5% better for the manual without tags, to around 8% better for the taggged version, but there's still work to do. The problem is that there is a strong chance to introduce regressions. I optimise only the PDF code I can check emitted in the resulting PDF file (with emacs), this _should_ limit regressions, but you never know. Now question time... 1. What do you think on the matter ? 2. Is there a way to check for the the tags ? 3. Is it available somewhere on OOo site (or elsewhere) a document containing most of the elements needed to have a test of all the execution paths in PDFWriterImpl ? That will be be most helpful. 4. You mentioned the code "\nendobj\n" so far I've seen "\nendobj\n\n" only, is the added eol char really needed for future PDF/A ? 5. It should be useful to add comment to the PDF file for debugging purposes, of course if and only if the PDFWriterImpl is compiled in debug version (the one with debug=true) can I do this when I find useful for further study ? 6. Last... my JCA still out on the wild ;) ? I can send another e-mail, but with red tape you never know... --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
