To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=35555
User mmeeks changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
CC|'lho' |'lho,stx12'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assigned to|ka |lho
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|STARTED |NEW
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target milestone|OOo Later |OOo 2.0.3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 21 02:54:44 -0800
2006 -------
Lutz, I'm re-assigning this to you & re-targetting to OO.o 2.0.3, I hope that's
ok. This has been blocked for 7 months on "the guys from user experience" - that
is not an ideal situation.
When I talked to you about this & showed you the results the conversation was
sadly inconclusively: AFAIR we wandered off into the issue of whether we should
use this on Win32 too [ IMHO transparently, obviously yes - but I'm prepared to
sacrifice the attractiveness of your Win32 version to get something decent on
Unix & keep a patch in our tree to turn this on unconditionally ].
*Surely* it is not controversial to use *the same* algorithm for insensitization
(rendering disabled icons differently) as the rest of the GNOME desktop. Of
course - we can make the patch conditional to just GNOME fairly trivially.
How is the process failure here going to get fixed ? preferably without a huge
burden of building, hand-holding install etc. of 'stock' OO.o packages for the
UI team - just so they can look at a few icons ? [ which we can trivially take
screenshots of them for ].
This is a *really* non-controversial change: again - to make OO.o do the same
thing as the rest of the desktop. It should be covered by whatever
'non-controversial' clause anyone has. It should be covered by the (still
non-existent?) UI team guidelines as to what is non-controversial & does not
require a lengthy wait.
Hopefully this is a transient abberation that will be fixed by a more pro-active
approach from the UI team ;-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
